Government
has made it clear in the wake of Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Bill, 2016
which has been passed by the Lok Sabha and is under consideration with Rajya
Sabha, some rumours have been making rounds that all gold jewellery including
ancestral jewellery shall be taxed @75% plus cess with a further penalty
liability of 10% of tax payable.
It
is hereby clarified that the above Bill has not introduced any new provision
regarding chargeability of tax on jewellery. The Bill only seeks to enhance the
applicable tax rate under section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act)
from existing 30% to 60% plus surcharge of 25% and cess thereon.
This section only provides rate of tax to be
charged in case of unexplained investment in assets. The chargeability of these
assets as income is governed by the provisions of section 69, 69A & 69B
which are part of the Act since 1960s. The Bill does not seek to amend the provisions
of these sections.
Tax rate under section 115BBE is proposed to
be increased only for unexplained income as there were reports that the tax
evaders are trying to include their undisclosed income in the return of income
as business income or income from other sources. The provisions of section
115BBE apply mainly in those cases where assets or cash etc. are sought to be
declared as ‘unexplained cash or asset’ or where it is hidden as
unsubstantiated business income, and the Assessing Officer detects it as such.
It
is clarified that the jewellery/gold purchased out of disclosed income or out
of exempted income like agricultural income or out of reasonable household
savings or legally inherited which has been acquired out of explained sources
is neither chargeable to tax under the existing provisions nor under the
proposed amended provisions.
In this connection, a reference to instruction
No.1916 is also invited which provides that during the search operations, no
seizure of gold jewellery and ornaments to the extent of 500 grams per married
lady, 250 grams per unmarried lady and 100 grams per male member of the family
shall be made. Further, legitimate holding of jewellery upto any extent is
fully protected.
In
view of the above, the apprehension sought to be created that the jewellery
with the household which is acquired out of disclosed sources or exempted
income shall become taxable under the proposed amendment is totally unfounded
and baseless.
Post a Comment